In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by that decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine,” to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the approach to make a team from group of employees in order to succeed new project. The former argues that there are numerous be benefits by doing so, but latter challenges each of these points.
First of all, the author suggests that the amalgam of people in project means assembling a diverse ideas, expertise, and skills, which not only helps to solve different obstacles and challenges through creative avenues, but also helps to make quick response. However, the professor in the lecture contends that this method will not work because some member of team could be carefree and not contributes as others. The team will be recognized as a whole and a well performer will not recognized. Furthermore, the lecture counters regarding to quick response of issue because many people has many opinions in order to solve problems during project, so meeting has to prolong frequently in order to get final decision. If some people influence over some ideas, then good perspectives will be dropped out.
Finally, the passage claims that taking part together can get popularity and reward through no suspicious decision, and team work can reached to zenith, have great accomplish than one individual working alone. Nevertheless, like other suggestions before, the professor in his lecture proclaims that this idea is not feasible because highly creative individual will be totally ignored. If one decision of team spoiled, then whole team will be blamed over there, which will be affect on the creative and innovative individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'idea'?
Suggestion: idea
...e in project means assembling a diverse ideas, expertise, and skills, which not only ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...method will not work because some member of team could be carefree and not contri...
^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'recognize'
Suggestion: recognize
...s a whole and a well performer will not recognized. Furthermore, the lecture counters rega...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ill be blamed over there, which will be affect on the creative and innovative individual....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, well, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19607843137 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61450130433 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596078431373 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0215137246 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184731309398 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707191974674 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057554796867 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123782463923 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475637866584 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.