The reading is about starting a new business by buying a franchise and provides three supportive reasons for doing so. However, professor refutes every reasons explained in the passage.
First, the reading claims that the problem for finding a reliable suppliers is eliminated by buying a franchise. The professor refutes this point by stating that it is not true always. He explains that those reliable suppliers force owner to buy their own products although they can find those products in cheaper rate in other suppliers. This can create disadvantage to the franchise company.
Secondly, the reading posits that the franchise can save money on advertising. However, the professor refutes by saying that it does advantages to the company not to their businesses. Further, they have to give 6% of their sales to the main company. The company won't be benefitted much by such strategy.
Lastly, the reading claims that a franchise offers more security than starting an independent business. However, the professor refutes by stating that it is not as secure as we consider it to be. He explains that rather than buying a franchise, it would be benefit to buy an already independent business. In that way, the company can have double success rate than buying a franchise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'supplier'?
Suggestion: supplier
...that the problem for finding a reliable suppliers is eliminated by buying a franchise. Th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, lastly, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0956937799 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72245860682 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516746411483 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3070223457 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0714285714 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9285714286 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228355651775 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726553500101 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433157892257 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133369092293 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135475209392 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.