Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.
First, atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is at least 90 times greater than the pressure at Earth’s surface. This means that a force of 100 kilograms is pressing down on every square centimeter of surface. All spacecraft that have landed on Venus have been crushed by this extreme pressure within an hour of landing. Almost anything humans might land on Venus would be crushed as well.
Second, as far as we know, there are no reservoirs of water on Venus’ surface, and the planet’s atmosphere, made up mostly of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid, contains hardly any oxygen or water vapor. Water and oxygen would therefore probably have to be supplied to Venus from Earth. The idea of ensuring a regular supply of water and oxygen from Earth is impractical in the extreme and would probably defeat the purpose of establishing a permanent station on Venus.
Third, very little sunlight reaches the planet’s surface. About 60 percent of the sunlight that hits Venus is reflected back into space by the thick clouds that fill the atmosphere, which means that only 40 percent of the sunlight can get through the clouds. Below these clouds is a dense layer of carbon dioxide, which blocks even more light, so very little light reaches the surface. The lack of light would prevent the use of solar power cells, so humans could not get electricity to power their machines and equipment.
The article states about the presence of the human on venus is quite impossible. However, the lecture completely opposes the point made in the reading. The professor says that it certainly possible.
First, the article posits that venus have high atmospheric pressure than earth and due to this stations and human will crashed if they will land on venus. This point is contradicted by the professor. he says that this problem will be solved if the station float above the 50 kilometers above the ground like the balloon. He further explains this point by the physical fact, higher the atmosphere leads to decrease in the pressure. Eventually, no station will crash.
Second, the reading claims that human can not survive on venus because there is no water and oxygen and we could not supply enough water and oxygen from the earth to the venus. However, the lecturer states that venus have other gasses like carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide and by the chemical process we can produce enough oxygen and water which will necessary for human survival.
Finally, the reading states that on venus we could not produce electricity because clouds are blocking sunlight and it could not reach the ground. The professor contradicts that point by saying that it is true, could reflect sunlight, however, the cloud thickness is not considerable. Furthermore, he explains that the solar power cells can collect sunlight from the above and below of clouds and by that way we can produce electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ospheric pressure than earth and due to this stations and human will crashed if they...
^^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crash'
Suggestion: crash
...and due to this stations and human will crashed if they will land on venus. This point ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...point is contradicted by the professor. he says that this problem will be solved i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00806451613 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44778988849 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2815545556 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5384615385 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118343670221 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429924874606 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616548622484 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771787156809 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429796492229 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.