do you agree or disagree? teachers should expose their social and political point of view with students?
The teacher is the role model for every student. Most of the students imitate the teachers' behavior, thinking, and their learning style. Teachers should disclose all their personal point of view. However, some people think that teacher should explain all current situation which includes social, political, and even her personal point of view so that student can learn and improve their current knowledge. Some people believe that teacher should not expose her social and political point of view, others would disagree. In my opinion, Teacher should focus on education rather than discussing the social and political point of views and help students to learn more about their educational subjects so that they can accomplish their task in future successfully and efficiently.
First, the teacher should maintain student concentration on studies and help them to understand their particular topics. They should not discuss any other political and social issues in the classroom because they divert the student concentration and eventually they both involve in the argument. For instance, my chemistry teacher discussed political issues all the time in class. Most of the student did not involve in it because they had not had any interest in that kind of topics and most of them involved in the argument with the professor. I noticed that the most of the class time passed in the political argument rather than learning chemistry. ultimately some of the students did not get good marks in the finals and they all blame our professor.
Second, the student could not make any strong decision regarding any issues because their teacher explains what are they thinking about political and social issues?. As a result, students imitate their thinking and views and they don't have any ability to make their own point of view also their thinking power will be restricted. For example, I remember one of my classmate, she was very influenced by the English teacher because of her unique political thinking and point of view. She could not think of herself. This shows me teacher should not explain their views in class.
To sum up, Teacher should not operate their students social and political point of view. Let them think more about that topics, so that they can able to make their own decisions in future easily and will not depend on anyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...udent. Most of the students imitate the teachers behavior, thinking, and their learning ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 653, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ultimately
...rgument rather than learning chemistry. ultimately some of the students did not get good m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 664, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...her than learning chemistry. ultimately some of the students did not get good marks in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...itate their thinking and views and they dont have any ability to make their own poin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, second, so, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08571428571 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44066023821 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444155844156 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3409683014 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.052631579 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425887626684 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167370856742 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118595406444 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292934079714 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914119417407 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.