The reading states that the extreme and inhospitable conditions on Venus makes the human presence impossible there; and provides reasons for the support. However, the professor explains that humans on Venus is certainly possible by creating a station floating on the Venus's atmosphere just 50 Km above its surface. This would probably solve each of the problems mentioned in the article.
First, the article posits that the atmospheric pressure at the Venus's surface is almost 90 times greater than that of the earth's. As a result, it will not only crush the spaceship but also the humans. However, the professor challenges this point by stating that the atmospheric pressure 50 km above the Venus's surface is similar to the normal pressure on the Earth. Consequently, being in a spaceship 50 km above the ground would eliminate the danger of being crushed.
Second, the reading avers that the unavailability of water and oxygen would defeat the purpose of establishing a permanent station on Venus. The professor rebuts this argument by saying that the venus's atmosphere contains CO2, nitrogen and sulphuric acid, which can be used to generate water and oxygen. She explains that using chemical materials at the station, water and oxygen can be produced for the survival. So, there won't be any need to export it from earth.
Finally, the article claims that because of the clouds and CO2 layer in the atmosphere, enough sunlight does not reach the planet's surface, preventing the production of solar energy to power the machines and equipments. On the other hand, the professor mentions that the clouds above the station, which is 50 km above the surface, are not so thick. As a result, there would be considerable amount of sunlight to power the solar cells. In addition, the sunlight reflected from the clouds below the station can also be used. Thus, the solar power cells can use both, the direct sunlight from above and the sunlight reflected from below, to generate more than enough electricity to power the station.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, second, so, thus, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05654761905 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58827806063 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494047619048 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3871022229 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1875 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210007391173 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721418981292 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568849003208 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131991626888 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626644669091 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.