Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.
First, atmospheric pressure at Venus’ surface is at least 90 times greater than the pressure at Earth’s surface. This means that a force of 100 kilograms is pressing down on every square centimeter of surface. All spacecraft that have landed on Venus have been crushed by this extreme pressure within an hour of landing. Almost anything humans might land on Venus would be crushed as well.
Second, as far as we know, there are no reservoirs of water on Venus' surface, and the planet's atmosphere, made up mostly of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid, contains hardly any oxygen or water vapor Water and oxygen would therefore probably have to be supplied to Venus from Earth. The idea of ensuring a regular supply of water and oxygen from Earth is impractical in the extreme and would probably defeat the purpose of establishing a permanent station on Venus.
Third, very little sunlight reaches the planet's surface. About 60 percent of the sunlight that hits Venus is reflected back into space by the thick clouds that fill the atmosphere, which means that only 40 percent of the sunlight can get through the clouds Below these clouds is a dense layer of carbon dioxide, which blocks even more light, so very little light reaches the surface. The lack of light would prevent the use of solar power cells, so humans could not get electricity to power their machines and equipment.
The reading is about the inhospitable and harsh conditions of Venus to support human life. It provides three supporting ideas in order to strengthen its claim. However, the professor found optimistic and convincing goal to survive on the Venus. He refutes each of the passage reasoning.
First, the article asserts that the high atmospheric pressure of Venus would hinder the landing of the spacecraft. But, the lecturer denies this reasoning. In addition he says, there is a way to build floating station above 50 km from the surface which minimize the fluctuation of pressure in the Venus. The floating station is rather accelerate the life in the Venus surface.
Second, the passage states that the unavailability of water make impossible to support human life in the Venus. However, the narrator refutes this idea. Apart from the reading explanations, he describes, the chemical process entails to make water in the Venus. Moreover, in this process it is also certain to use the existing materials from the Venus which also cut the cost of transportation of required materials from earth.
Third, the written excerpt claims that the scarce ray of sunlight is the reason for the inhospitably of human existence in the Venus. The point is quite incoherent with the speaker. Because, he delineates, the clouds above level is not thick to refrain sunlight coming. Furthermore, the possibility of electricity production is also high by using the available sunlight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... the lecturer denies this reasoning. In addition he says, there is a way to build floati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'accelerated'.
Suggestion: accelerated
...e Venus. The floating station is rather accelerate the life in the Venus surface. Secon...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23628691983 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83382890564 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548523206751 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2741113241 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5625 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8125 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132071816207 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418663962687 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053277038814 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782371830195 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131089135345 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.