Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots. Use specific examples and reasons to support your opinions.
Robot is one of the greatest invention of modern science. In our everyday life we see the presence of robots and their involvement in many ways to smooth our deeds. According to the given statement eventually all jobs will be accomplished by using robots, some would support it, others would disagree with it. In my view, the presence and desire to use robots and suppliant of human is a mere illusion rather than concrete proof because of the following two reason.
The main reason is whatever robot is doing and advancing is due to the human designing. The innovation of robots and their application in different aspects of our lives is only possible due the invention and it has been possible only for human creativity. For example, when I was in third year student of my university life, I had a great fascination for the automated task in our everyday life. Later I searched on Google to find out the details about them. And I found that robot has been created and controlled by human replica. Their knowledge and power is possible because they were created and designed. As you can see that robot is presence in our lives only for our accomplishment rather than their telltale achievement will be undisclosed.
Another reason is that robots are not always accurate in their deeds. In our everyday life robots are used in various fields such as school exam, disease detection, traffic control, especially artificial intelligence and often they predicts many flawed results. For instance, a few days ago I have been reading an articles on “Robot in disease detection and prediction” from Scientific American. The columnist said robots are always given us confusing and may be fatal results during malign detection, that is further tends us to feel uncomfortable and worried. And he also said that, a survey had conducted in Philadelphia population and found that they depends on robots assumptions and predictions and they were feeling uneasiness and worried for their health. Later found that the prediction accuracy of robot is not as accurate as human detection and determination. This experience taught me that robots are not going to replace human position rather they will be less applicable in future.
In sum, someone disagree with the robot less versatility and their less accuracy in future. The robot is not only inferior to human brain and accomplishment but also they are quite flawed in their works. Hence, the possible replacement of human by robot is a mere illusion and this type of statement should be curtailed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'predict'
Suggestion: predict
... artificial intelligence and often they predicts many flawed results. For instance, a fe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an article' or simply 'articles'?
Suggestion: an article; articles
...nce, a few days ago I have been reading an articles on “Robot in disease detection and pred...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...adelphia population and found that they depends on robots assumptions and predictions a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 739, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worried about'?
Suggestion: worried about
...ns and they were feeling uneasiness and worried for their health. Later found that the pred...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 986, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ion rather they will be less applicable in future. In sum, someone disagree with the r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
...pplicable in future. In sum, someone disagree with the robot less versatility and the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ess versatility and their less accuracy in future. The robot is not only inferior to huma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... type of statement should be curtailed.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, third, for example, for instance, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76002507385 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498823529412 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9016296822 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.19047619 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21445839529 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651111240426 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601106146588 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144283567311 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641962610082 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.