Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
We know the proverb 'Education is the backbone of nation'. The importance of education is huge because the picture is crystal in every areas of our life. We started our learning from the very beginning to the very end of our life. The feasibility of spending money for young is more important for the successful development than spending money behind the university is the given statement-with this someone would agree, others would not. In my view, the government should spend more money for university to extract more advantages. I think in this way for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that any country in the world is truly based on its research. The more developed in research the more advancement. In addition, university is the place where it is possible to run a comprehensive research in different topics such as, anthropology, archaeology, biology, evolution and so on. For example, a few days ago the Nobel Prize were given and it was understandable that the prize is more tilt on these country who spend more money for research areas. Moreover, in this year, our country Bangladesh did not receive any prize in any categories. The reason is that, although our country government is spending a lot of money for school level education but in university the fund of money becomes shrinking. For this reason, the true development has not been possible for our country and cannot shed any light in the international arena. As you can see that, the development of any countrys research is determined by the university. So, depriving on these institutions are causes the aloofness from the international impact.
Another reason is that university life is the time of leadership development. So, spending money behind university gives a way to the development of many clubs such as language, debate, science and history. If these clubs gets money for refurbishment then students are getting more chance to involve them on these activities that entails themselves to become pragmatic. For instance, when I was studying in university I often used to go history club. By going on that club I came to know the wide history of our country and also knew our countrys leader. After that, I was changed my career plan and worked to become a leader like our ancestors. This experience taught me that the influence I got to become a leader was not possible if I was devoid of learning our countrys leaders and it was possible only due to the development of our club.
In conclusion, it is possible to argue with me by delineating the advantages of spending money behind school education but in reality the picture will not feasible. The spending money for university not only enrich country research but also helps to develop a skill leadership. So, our government should spend more money for university to get a pragmatic benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'comprehensive research'.
Suggestion: comprehensive research
...s the place where it is possible to run a comprehensive research in different topics such as, anthropolo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86506400763 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455301455301 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8700626852 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.16 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.24 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408871187922 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123664230155 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110945378527 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294958701689 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108628024219 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.