Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Education, the foundation of the prosperity of a country, has triggered heated discussions on whether spending money on the education of young children is more important than on college students. Universities, in some people's view, should receive more fundings from the government. On the contrary, my perspective is that more money should be spent on teenagers for the following reasons.

To begin with, giving priority to children's education will place more people as beneficiaries, contributing more to the successful development of a country. Specifically, never should we ignore that most children will enter elementary schools but not many people choose to enter colleges. Therefore, money spent on primary schools will benefit more citizens, especially in some economically less developed areas. With money from the governors, children from destitute families will be more likely to get scholarships and enter schools. As a result, most teenagers in this country will have access to fundamental education regardless of their financial backgrounds. This will, undoubtedly, improve the average education of the nation. However, allocating more budget to the universities will only benefit few people compared with the primary schools, which will have less effect on the development of the whole country.

In addition, investment in young children is more effective than in universities, because kids have more potential than adults. It is well acknowledged that kids do not have anything entrenched in their minds, and can be educated to become different genius according to their talent. In detail, by receiving appropriate guidance, some of them are likely to become experts in specific fields when they grow up. Obviously, these people will contribute more than normal individuals to the prosperity of the country. Investing in the kids’ education will definitely get more rewards than allocating money to universities.

Besides, in order to nurture these kids effectively, more money should be distributed to experienced teachers in primary schools. Young children, in comparison to adults, are not mature and don't know the significance of the study, so experienced teachers are supposed to apply suitable pedagogical methods to them. For instance, teachers should make the class more interesting, and engage children in class discussion and presentation, which motivates kids to get actively involved and learn better. Training and hiring these excellent teachers will inevitably cost a plethora of money. In contrast, students in the university are mature enough and more willing to study. As a result, it is not necessary to demand teachers in universities to be as proficient as in primary schools, decreasing the salaries required by the professors.

In conclusion, the money should be spent more on the education of young children because of the large number of students, the potential of young kids, and more requirement for teaching kids.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...omparison to adults, are not mature and dont know the significance of the study, so ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...kids to get actively involved and learn better. Training and hiring these excellent te...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2520.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55066079295 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03049122093 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491189427313 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3389655334 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.545454545 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265816026895 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852872148456 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632702589707 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171918947426 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521117975152 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.