Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education, the foundation of the prosperity of a country, has triggered heated discussions on whether it is more important to spend money on the education of young children than on college students. Universities, in some people's view, should receive more fundings from the government. On the contrary, my perspective is that more money should be spent on teenagers for the following reasons.
To begin with, due to the large number of young children, education on them contributes more to the successful development of a country. Specifically, never should we ignore that most children will enter elementary schools but not many people choose to enter colleges. Therefore, money spent on primary schools will benefit more citizens in this country, especially in some economically less developed areas. With enough funding, children from destitute families will be more likely to get scholarships and enter schools. As a result, most teenagers in this country will have access to fundamental education regardless of their financial backgrounds. This will, undoubtedly, improve the average education of the whole country, and thus benefit society. However, giving money to the universities will only benefit few people compared with funding the primary schools, which will have less effect on the development of the whole country.
In addition, spending money on young children is more effective than on universities, because kids have more potential than adults. It is well acknowledged that kids can be shaped to become different kinds of genius and thus have more possibilities than adults. To be more specific, by receiving appropriate guidance and education, some of them are probable to become experts in specific fields when they grow up. Obviously, these people will definitely contribute more than normal individuals to the prosperity of the country. Investing in the kids’ education will get more rewards than allocating money to universities.
Besides, in order to nurture these kids, more money should be distributed to training and hiring experienced teachers in primary schools. Young children, compared with adults, are not mature enough and don't know the significance of the study. Experienced teachers are supposed to apply suitable pedagogical methods to each student so as to improve their personal development. For instance, teachers should make the class more interesting, or engage children in class discussion and presentation, which motivates kids to get actively involved and learn better. In contrast, the students in the university are mature enough and are more willing to study by themselves. As a result, the teachers in universities need to spend less effort on teaching, decreasing the requirement of training and hiring teachers.
In conclusion, the money should be spent more on the education of young children because of the large number of students, the potential of young kids, and more requirement for teaching kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... with adults, are not mature enough and dont know the significance of the study. Exp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ble pedagogical methods to each student so as to improve their personal development. For...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 553, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...kids to get actively involved and learn better. In contrast, the students in the unive...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48689956332 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96376369413 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467248908297 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7264994523 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.227272727 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22727272727 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282563134005 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923870280289 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713668656952 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183178077353 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044265585591 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.