Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Cars are the most important transport in this modern civilization. Without car, it is hard to think in the transportation world. We are using cars in our daily lives as an integral part. After twenty years the possible no of reduction of cars seems to me whimsical although someone might have been an agreement with the proclamation. I think in that way because of the two important reasons.
The main reason is that, the urbanization is an incessant matter in our present time. Day by day we are used to accumulate and adapt with the improving milieu of our roads. Now a days we are using car as an important way of transport on that road. Government and other transport organization is working to improving the road structure that entails our demand to buy more cars to hit on the road. For example, I was born in the remote areas in Bangladesh, where twenty years ago there was no concrete road and no bridge. We were using muddy road and boat to cross the road. But after 20 years the scenarios has been changed dramatically. Now the availability of concrete roads are high, that intuitively demanded to buy cars to need. As a result many landowners and landlords are used to ride on the cars as the have better road facilities. As you can see, better road is forming that in return increasing demand to buy more cars.
Another reason is that, the number of population is increasing day by day that ultimately pressed to buy cars. The world is now experiencing more population than twenty years ago. To meet the high population demand and also corporate fields is now spacious that in return demands more car buying. For instance, in Dhaka a capital city of Bangladesh, twenty years ago, and the number of population was less and also less number of multinational companies than now. These high population and increasing office goers made it urgent to buy more cars. When a family has six members, they would have four children, two children needs to go university others children needs to go office. So, they need two cars to meet their time demand. This experience taught me that, as the population and business proliferating, the demand of buying cars is also skyrocketing.
In sum, after twenty years we will see more cars on the roads than what we used to see today. This not only will occur due to the urbanization but also occurs as the result of increasing population and mercantile demand. As a result, we should not enough room to avoid the offing where, the number of cars is increasing than decreasing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...l part. After twenty years the possible no of reduction of cars seems to me whimsi...
^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to accumulating'.
Suggestion: used to accumulating
... in our present time. Day by day we are used to accumulate and adapt with the improving milieu of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...with the improving milieu of our roads. Now a days we are using car as an important way of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... the improving milieu of our roads. Now a days we are using car as an important way of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, for instance, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6981981982 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69411548718 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457207207207 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2493979578 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2307692308 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181765427322 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569759988239 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477100606182 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126276221734 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344073523255 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.