Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are the designer for the students because their guidelines often encourage his pupils most than any other thing in the world. The importance of teachers is understandable from the ancient time to the present world. The students learn comprehensively in a group project than working alone is the given excerpt- with this someone would agree, others would not. In my view, students are now learn more intelligently by working alone because of the following two important reason.
The main reason is that the availability of internet makes students autonomous and self-dependent. By clicking on the internet a wide area of topics are available where a student can choose what he needs more and what he does not need? And, the accuracy of information can be measured by comparing information from different sites. For example, when I was in my university life, I used to work by myself rather than doing cumulative project work. Because, group work often pose many superiority problems where one of the students indulge other to accept his view. So, I worked alone by helping through the internet. It was easy for me to complete the assigned work fastly because there was no chance to delay like group work. As you can see that, working alone helps someone to curb the superiority and delay problem that occurs in the group project because the person work in a single way more independent to use his materials.
Another reason is that working alone makes someone discreet and confident. The person who is discreet in his choice and not diffident is more competent than other. Become discreet is the early requirement for any work where to derive the information from a jumble of information is the utmost priority. To be more specific, in our university class, most of the time it was found that the students who were working in a group often diffident their decisions because during group work they were practicing to depends on other judgment. This behavior often made themselves weak about their confidence level. After years, the possibility of getting good job for them was also diminished. This experience taught me that, the self-dependent work is important for getting success not only in a university project but also in a career.
In conclusion, it is possible someone to argue by taking position on group works but in reality these supposed benefits will not sustainable for individual growth and prosperity. Working alone not only makes someone efficient to their work but also prepares them as a competent candidate for future job. So, we should practice to work alone to get the greater benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...would not. In my view, students are now learn more intelligently by working alone bec...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...her than doing cumulative project work. Because, group work often pose many superiority...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 875, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a single way" with adverb for "single"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e group project because the person work in a single way more independent to use his materials. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'depend'.
Suggestion: depend
...ring group work they were practicing to depends on other judgment. This behavior often ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0114416476 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72911861838 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491990846682 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3976662739 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5454545455 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306490902117 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950860900923 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719705842164 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198580690936 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688745163671 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.