The article disscuses about the suralose which is an artificial sweetener and its danger for the body. In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments presented in the reading passage. He states many studies showed that sucrolose is perfectly useful for people and is also safe.
First of all, he states that effecting in mice thymus which is pointed in the article is dependent on the dose. He clarifies that no effect was seen on the rat unless they used extreme amounts of sucralose. For having effect on thymus if we equivalent the amount for human, people have to use 4000 packets per day for one month which is not possible and reasonable and nobody uses them this much.
Also, the lecturer states organoclorines as the reading says are toxic for the body and accumulate in fat tissues but sucralose act differently and does not make any danger. In contrast of the idea presented in the reading, clorine in sucrolose has different characteristic to other forms which are toxic for the body. In fact, sucrolose does not absorb by digestive system and hence does not accumluate in the body. So,There is no build up in fat tissue and harm for the body.
Lastly, the professor states for other artificial sweetener using them may crave people to use more sweets and cakes but sucrolose do not break down when heated. Therefore, people can use it in cakes and sweets and be still on their diet and be on track and lose their weight. In contrary,use of other sweetener may encourage people to eat sweet more, which has lots of sugur and make them obese. In fact, other artificial sweetener will breakdown when are heated and do not have this capability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...rently and does not make any danger. In contrast of the idea presented in the reading, c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , There
...ence does not accumluate in the body. So,There is no build up in fat tissue and harm f...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , use
...track and lose their weight. In contrary,use of other sweetener may encourage people...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, may, so, still, therefore, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70805369128 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48483758403 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0890939529 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31826585379 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992723882269 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840672432971 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178322836251 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537392540307 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.