Mars, Moon, Scientist, radiation, zero-gravity environment, water, food, hydroponic, shielded, many months
In this set of material, both the author of the reading passage and the lecturer are discussing how it can be possible to send human to Mars. Although author notifies that solving a number of problems would be required for the project of sending humans to Mars, the professor casts doubts on the author's claims, and she does not agree with the author even though she believes it is challenging. In what follows, the reasons for both the author and the lecturer will be substantiated.
Firstly, both of the passage and talk have a debate on food and water supplies. According to the reading, it is said that scientists should spend two years to go on the Mars and come back to the earth, and the food and water supply can be challengeable. On the other hand, the professor states that they can cultivate hydroponic. This kind of plant needs a little space, and it can recycle the water. The scientists can also collect drink water and fresh air to their breath.
Secondly, the reading and the lecturer are discussing about scientists' body problem. The author acclaims that there is zero-gravity environment of space on the human body, and it lead to muscle mass reduction and lower bone density. In contrast, the professor proclaims that other scientists once maintained many months in this situation. Moreover, several techniques can save their muscles mass. Scientists can do some exercises to prevent it.
Finally, the author of the passage asserts that some radiations emitted by the sun are dangerous for scholars. But, the professor believes these radiations are not in dangerous level. Also, scholars can have some shielded clothes on the Mars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ment of space on the human body, and it lead to muscle mass reduction and lower bone...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62164758514 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6187950266 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0625 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166538287361 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532814461424 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424897378089 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915599939317 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642155765502 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.