Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, factories have a lot of work to do, and workers should do their tasks for long time during the workday very well. To reach this, entrepreneurs have to use several techniques in their factories. One of these techniques can be about their workers so that they must have many different kinds of work to do during the workday instead of they do same tasks all day long. There are some reasons for this statement in my viewpoint, and in what follows, a couple of reasons will be discussed.
Firstly, workers should have many different types of work to do during the workday because it can be exciting for them. If they do many different tasks, they will not feel boring. So, their efficiency will increase, and they do more tasks with different type than when they do same task in the same time. For example, I was working in a factory two years ago, and I was an operator in one section. My work was programming ICs, testing the automation system, and so forth. It was exciting task for me and I was eager to do them. But one day, the manager sent me another section, and I had to work on only one thing. After two hours, I abandon my work, and I went to talk about it with manager. He agreed with me, and I could comeback my previous task. Thus, if the manager did not agree with my request, my efficiency would decrease after a while.
Secondly, employers can have profit from doing different kinds of tasks by workers because they become accomplished in many tasks, and they can to other works when a worker done that task is patient. For instance, my brother works in a company in the downtown. He is an employee designing Electronic Circuits. Because workers in his company do many kinds of tasks, they are familiar with their co-workers work. So, when a worker cannot reach on time or has a difficulty, other employees can to his tasks. Therefore the manager should not have any concern about the tasks. So, doing several work by a worker has great effect for both employees and employees.
To conclude, if workers have many different tasks in their workplace, i will cause to exciting moments for them during the workday, and will be better for their employers so that their product line of factories will not stop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ut their workers so that they must have many different kinds of work to do during the workday ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...iscussed. Firstly, workers should have many different types of work to do during the workday ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...it can be exciting for them. If they do many different tasks, they will not feel boring. So, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ulty, other employees can to his tasks. Therefore the manager should not have any concern...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...mployees. To conclude, if workers have many different tasks in their workplace, i will cause ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...any different tasks in their workplace, i will cause to exciting moments for them...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55721393035 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42701437007 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450248756219 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4918937471 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2727272727 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378433829423 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119703484014 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129264653516 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249465115917 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895724799574 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.