Martin Bernal's Afrocentrism

Essay topics:

Martin Bernal's Afrocentrism

The lecturer says that the idea of Afrocentntrism by Marin Bernal is absurd and less convincing. This contracts the reading passage's main thoughts claimed by Martin Bernal, who insisted that Greek legacies are largely indebted to that of Africa and Asia.
Firstly, the lecturer argues that there is no adequate archeological evidence for Africa's colonization over Greece. Furthermore, what Bernal suggests as the prove of the colonization contradicts each other. It is true that the architectural style or the alphabet letters that Greeks created in ancient time partially referenced on that of Egypt, but the process must have been done in peaceful ways. This goes against with the reading passage's idea that Africa once took forceful dominance over Greece.
Second, the lecturer says that the philosophical traits of Greek are so unique and unprecedented. To be specific, they focus on nature rather than supernatural divine. Also, Greek made their own alphabet letters in 7 BC, which was earlier era than the time Egyptian created their own. This refutes the reading passage's idea that the philosophical works Greeks have been celebrated was merely a copied wholesome of the Egyptian works.
Third, the lecturer points out that there is no possibility about a few racist scholars intentionally spread out white European-based ancient history in the last 20 century. This is due to the fact that massive studies on Greek culture and history were done during the time, so we got to knew more about Greek than actual Greek people did about themselves. This contradicts the reading passage's idea that bias historians destroyed the tradition of Afro-Asiatic culture.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e. Furthermore, what Bernal suggests as the prove of the colonization contradicts each ot...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, third, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29433962264 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8153472495 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6376369606 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0596104514627 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254750570722 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480391447572 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519117511225 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714113111029 0.0443174109184 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.