Seneca's literary work of art
The lecturer argues that Seneca's literary works are oeverated than it deserves. This goes againts with the reading passage's idea that Seneca's works are underrated.
First, the lexturer says that the Seneca's influence on Shakespeare does not make his literary works worth of investing time. To be specific, university lecture classes are limited in time, so it's better to learn something more valuable. Due to this reason, the lecturer argues that there are only few reasons to read Seneca's works which are inferior than that of Shakespear. This refutes the reading passage's claim that modern students should be aware of Seneca's influence on the history of playwright and thus read him like they do read Shakespear.
Second, the lecturer does no agree on the notion that Senaca's works has rich qualities. For example, one of his work depics an uncles cooking his newfews and serve it to the very father of the dead children. The lecturer beileves that kind of carnivorous scene is nothing more than a pure violence. This goes againt with the reading passage's proclaim that Seneca's tragedies are thenatically rich.
Third, the lecturer points out that the quality of Seneca's works might be worth investing time for those who study ancient history, but not attractive enough for those who are ingaged in an academic subject of world literaure. This goes against with the reading passage's idea that Seneca's works have been oversighted and thus deserves a proper spotlight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective inferior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...o read Senecas works which are inferior than that of Shakespear. This refutes the re...
^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ry, but not attractive enough for those who are ingaged in an academic subject of world...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, third, thus, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10788381743 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45147110458 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564315352697 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9671277435 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.583333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241736987574 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109260993276 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890733766546 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183333462274 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829456565264 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.