Mission on Mars
The reading and the lecture are both about the mission to Mars. The author of the reading feels that the project of sending humans to Mars will require solving a lot of problems. The lecturer challenged the claims made by the author. She is of opinion that there are challenges to these problems.
First, the author argues that a round trip from and to Mars will require two years which is a long time trip. The article mentions that the water and the food supplies will no be fit in the spaceship. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that in spaceship they can use hydroponics which is plants in water instead of being in soil. Additionally, she says that plants in water have some advantages like plants take carbon dioxide and give oxygen, recycle wastewater and clean it to become good to drink, and plants in the water will be less in size.
Secondly, the writer suggests that while mission to Mars the astronauts will be in a zero-gravity environment for many months. In the article, it is said that being in zero gravity for a long time has side effects like decreased muscle tone, and lower bone density. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that we can use techniques to prevent the effect of zero gravity. She elaborates this by bringing up the point that astronauts can do exercise to reduce the effect on muscle mass, and use vitamins and minerals like calcium to reduce the effect on bone density.
Finally, the author posits that astronauts on a mission to Mars will be exposed to harmful solar radiation. Moreover, the article stated that using a shield to protect the spaceship at this time is impossible because that will add a lot of weight to the spaceship so the astronauts will be at risk of solar radiation. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that solar radiation is not very dangerous. She notes that only occasionally the astronauts will be exposed to radiation and while that they can use a shield that does not add weight, and can use the instrument to monitor when radiation starts to hit the spaceship.
In conclusion, the lecturer's opinion is opposing the author's opinion
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...will require solving a lot of problems. The lecturer challenged the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...at the water and the food supplies will no be fit in the spaceship. This specific ...
^^
Line 2, column 563, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
... drink, and plants in the water will be less in size. Secondly, the writer suggests that wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...hit the spaceship. In conclusion, the lecturers opinion is opposing the authors opinion...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 374.0 270.72406181 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7486631016 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55954845313 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459893048128 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8867520952 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137121066573 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539410531919 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965570584091 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775462820475 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05601246283 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.