Model of a painting
Both the reading and the lecture discuss an unknown model for the painting of Johannes Vermeer's "Girl with a Pearl Earring". The writer postulates several theories about the actual figure being portrayed in the painting of Vermeer and provides three hypotheses to endorse its idea. However, the professor states although the model is unrevealed, the provided theories are not true and gainsays each of them.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that the first candidate is Maria Vermeer. Since Vermeer found the source of inspiration in daily life, he depicted the reflection of daily scenes of his daughter's life. So, his daughter must have been posed for the painting. On the other hand, the professor explains his interest in daily life scenes does not mean that he chose his daughter as a subject. His other 40 pieces of art contain figures as a subject, for instance, man and woman, maids, and the mistress also occurred as models. Therefore, it is not clear how the model is.
Next, the professor further explains the details that in the 17th century the status and likeliness of the figure were also shown in the picture. Moreover, the social class and pride of people were also depicted. If the daughter of Vermeer's patron was the model, Van Ruijven would have asked him to show her as an upscale figure. These claims refute the writer's implication about Magdalena Van Ruijven being the model because Vermeer gifted her that painting as a wedding gift.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by declaring the tronie theory that people used tronie genre in their paintings to show the imaginary figures in the 17th century. In contrast, the speaker refutes this point by showing the inaccuracy of the author that it was not the style of Vermeer to draw facial imaginory expressions. His other paintings revealed his realistic observations
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...upscale figure. These claims refute the writers implication about Magdalena Van Ruijven...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06430868167 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53958639834 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572347266881 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5677820329 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242252943826 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764107941612 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859406158167 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15307789702 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086347967499 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.