modified trees and natural ones
Both the passage and the lecture discuss genetic modified trees. The passage claims that genetic modification will improve trees and bring many benefits by explaining three of them. In the opposite, the professor says that there are some serious problems along with benefits of these trees. She refutes each benefit of modified trees mentioned in passage.
Firstly, the reading states that these trees are more durable in hard conditions in comparison to nature ones. The professor denies this passage's claim by saying that modified trees will be resistant in a particular condition but without any guarantee to survive because all of them in one species are closely uniform which cause universally possible attack, but the natural ones are diverse with different genes which prevent extinction of those with one particular attack. They have more ability to survive because of more diversity.
Secondly, the passages talks about economic benefits of modified trees because of their faster growth and following greater yields. oppositely, the professor oppose this by stating that the seeds of modified trees which cost a lot, can be freely collected but people must pay money to company each time of planting these tree because of the law.
Third, according to passage, modified trees prepare normal condition for prevention of overexploitation of wild trees. In fact, these faster growth trees can use as firewood and building timber instead of those wild. The professor contradicts this idea by explanation of aggressive growth of modified trees among natural ones which cause competition among them and natural ones for resources. And in this way they can cause more damages rather than having benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Oppositely
...er growth and following greater yields. oppositely, the professor oppose this by stating t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34074074074 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53995236662 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6593338376 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436911996126 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146315639035 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124417314731 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265687935753 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813777100277 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.