modified trees and natural ones
Both the passage and the lecture discuss genetic modified trees. The passage claims that genetic modification will improve trees and bring many benefits by explaining three of them. In the opposite, the professor said it is true that the modified trees have benefits but there are some serious problems with them.
Firstly, the reading states that these trees are more durable in hard conditions in comparison to nature ones. the professor denies this passage's claim by saying that modified trees will be resistant in a particular condition but without any guarantee to survive because all of them in one species are closely uniform which cause universally possible attack, but the natural ones are diverse with different which prevent extinction of those with one particular attack. They have more ability to survive because of more diversity.
Secondly, the passages talks about economic benefits of modified trees because of their faster growing and following greater yields. oppositely, the professor oppose this by stating that the seed of modified trees which cost a lot, can be collected but people must pay money to company each time of planting these tree.
Third, according to passage, modified trees prepare normal condition for prevention of overexploitation of wild trees. In these faster grow trees can use as firewood and building timber instead of those wild. The professor decline this by explanation of aggressive grow of modified trees among natural ones which cause competition among them with natural ones for resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...onditions in comparison to nature ones. the professor denies this passages claim by...
^^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are diverse with different which prevent extinction of those with one particular ...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Oppositely
...r growing and following greater yields. oppositely, the professor oppose this by stating t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34016393443 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5670889309 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561475409836 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.1234454391 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.454545455 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469464926149 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169713644126 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116182979539 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288120431092 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938715534183 0.0443174109184 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.