ntegrated essay suggested in TPO 8
Both the reading and the lecturer talk about the validity of evidences stated by Chevalier de Seingalt about European society in 18th century. Although the reading material supports three main hypotheses for the fact that Chevalier' memoir was not as valid as he has stated, the lecturer finds all reasons dubious and provides three counter evidences to refute them all.
Considering the first theory, the reading holds the view that Chevalier wasn't rich enough and he borrowed money from merchants of Switzerland. However, the lecturer refers this fact that he wasn't as poor as the author thinks since he possessed huge amount of properties and wealth and it could have taken a few days to change his properties into cash, so while he was waiting for money of his sold properties, he must have borrowed some money from merchants.
Furthermore, in spite of the author's hesitation about the exact conversation between Voltaire and Chevalier, the lecturer contends that according to witnesses, Chevalier used to jog down everything happening in every night of his life and also he kept his notes and referred them whenever needed.
Eventually, the reading states that his escape from prison could not have happened through jail's ceiling in Venice and he must have bribed to free himself. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that there were also a lot of people in the prison even with better connection and relationships with prisoner-keepers-in-charge who could have made them free. Thus, this hypothesis about giving money is not true about him. Moreover, the presence of an old Venetian document has proved that the ceiling of the jail he attended, repaired soon after he became free. This ceiling would not been repaired unless some damages had been occurred there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...e reading holds the view that Chevalier wasnt rich enough and he borrowed money from ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
..., the lecturer refers this fact that he wasnt as poor as the author thinks since he p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rchants. Furthermore, in spite of the authors hesitation about the exact conversation...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jails'' or 'jail's'?
Suggestion: jails'; jail's
... prison could not have happened through jails ceiling in Venice and he must have brib...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11340206186 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75798405888 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.1328629584 49.2860985944 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.