Nutria
The reading and the listening discuss on Nutria. The reading part suggests the ways to keep Nutria away from the area, while the lecture disagrees with the author because it has some flaws.
Firstly, the article claims that metal fences and wall should be build in the surrounding. Because Nutria can not make a hole in it. However, the lecturer insists that Nutria are good at digging underground holes. As deaper the walls will be built the Nutria will dig a hole below it and will enter into the area through it.
Next, the author asserts that as there is water in drainage Nutrias travel through the drainage lines. So drying the lines will not allow them to enter in the area. In contrast, the professor argues that removing water from the lines would be extreme measure. Because the sugar canes and rice croups need water for proper growth and removal of water can cause a negative impact on the livelihood of the people.
Finally, the passage states that cooking Nutria will a good option as its meat has a good texture and it is easy to cook. The meat also has more proteins as compared to other animal meat. On the other hand, The teacher points out that the meat of Nutria has bad effects on humans. The meat of Nutria consists of various parasites and dieases which can cause a major health issues such as Tuber clauses and many more. The food consumed can also cause rashes on the body also it can cause feaver and weight loss.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...all should be build in the surrounding. Because Nutria can not make a hole in it. Howev...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, so, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55769230769 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04263361154 2.5805825403 79% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.669543729 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340825079129 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136093856674 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123575355171 0.0662205650399 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217005153638 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818942283598 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.3589403974 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.