Reading of Literature books.
Both the reading and lecture discuss on the topic about reading of literature books. While the reading states that readers do not read the literature book for several reasons and the lecture disagrees.
First, the reading passage claims that imagination and intellectual of human increase by reading literature books. This books exercise the imagination. However, the lecture insists that intellectual also can be increased also by reading science, history, and political science books. She says that his book are more of high quality that the literature books.
Second, the lecture claims that the trends of reading book has been lower. And people also can listen to good music as an entertainment. This changes is because of culture change. In contrast the passage states that insted of reading books people watch TV or listen to music, which is not good form of entertainment and has lower the culture.
Finally, the reading states that, their are lack of audince to read book and because of that the publications dont invest on literature books. Because of this many talented authors are not able to publish the books due to poor standard of readers. In contrast, the lecture argues that the fault is of authors. Because the authors write the book in a difficult language which is hard to understand by the readers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reading states that readers do not read the literature book for several reasons ...
^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...music as an entertainment. This changes is because of culture change. In contrast ...
^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...hanges is because of culture change. In contrast the passage states that insted of read...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge. In contrast the passage states that insted of reading books people watch TV ...
^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ure. Finally, the reading states that, their are lack of audince to read book and be...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ok and because of that the publications dont invest on literature books. Because of ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ations dont invest on literature books. Because of this many talented authors are not a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re argues that the fault is of authors. Because the authors write the book in a difficu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04109589041 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57043153646 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502283105023 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5125782073 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8571428571 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6428571429 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.550006207638 0.272083759551 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196862660329 0.0996497079465 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155901033474 0.0662205650399 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.371925286579 0.162205337803 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122428762481 0.0443174109184 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.