One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest that th

Both the reading and the lecure are about an invention called turtle excluder device (TED) that will solve the problem when turtle get trapped in commercial shrimp-fishing nets. The reading doubt the function of the device. On the other hand, the lecture contradicts each points presented in the reading.

To begin with, the reading asserts that TED will not be efficient because only one turtle get trapped every month. Also, shrimp fisherman will lose some of its catch since some shrimp can escape from the nets. However, the lecture refutes this. She says that there are about 1000 shrimp fisherman so it will catch 1000 turtles. Moreover, the ecomonical purposes cannot be compared to the damage that will happen for the endangered turtle species.

Next, although it is a good idea to limit the nets underwater, it is just a theory. The lecturer explain that it is impossible for the sea patrol to observe around 1000 fisherman. Instead of limiting the time, she give suggestion to always check the TED and force to use it before the fisherman go to the sea.

Last, the author mentions that TED will be not efficient for larger turtles. Nevertheless, the lecturer expain that this is not a problem. TED can be redesign to be larger for accomodating larger endangered species.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...ater, it is just a theory. The lecturer explain that it is impossible for the sea patro...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fisherman' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fishermen'.
Suggestion: fishermen
...r the sea patrol to observe around 1000 fisherman. Instead of limiting the time, she give...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...rman. Instead of limiting the time, she give suggestion to always check the TED and ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50978251268 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562211981567 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5932634707 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173999277913 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508852378603 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610646183581 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100222204697 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605291561421 0.0443174109184 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.