One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die.
The article states that nets that commercial shrimp use for fishing boats causes sea turtles to get stuck in the nets and they can not get back to the surface of the ocean to breathe and they die. The one way to protect the turtle from dying is using a turtle excluder device (TED) and it helps turtles escape, passage mentions that point using TEDs is not a good idea for several reasons. However, the professor refutes each of the author's ideas.
First, the reading claims that just once a month one turtle is stuck in nets and it is not too much. Moreover, using TEDs is costly for shrimpers and the possibility of losing shrimp is too high in comparison with the small chance of saving one turtle. The professor refutes this point by saying that shrimpers kill thousands of turtles each year and because of that turtles' population decreases every year.
Second, the article posits that protecting sea turtles is might be more impressible than using TEDs. One way is they can use is having a time limitation for shrimp boats when their nets are underwater, after the time limit is reached, the nets should be pulled out and shrimpers release the turtles from the nets. The professor says that the time limitation idea is good in theory but in the reality, they can not control thousands of boats' time.
Finally, the passage claims that TEDs are still small for the huge type of turtles. However, the professor opposes this point by explaining that in the areas where they are large species of turtle live there it is not hard to create larger TEDs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'turtles'' or 'turtle's'?
Suggestion: turtles'; turtle's
...f turtles each year and because of that turtles population decreases every year. Secon...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e it is not hard to create larger TEDs.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64130434783 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21486488166 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485507246377 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.0059556215 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.1 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411523997954 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151355268636 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158760502168 0.0662205650399 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241782928638 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140770833098 0.0443174109184 318% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.