Online encyclopedia
The reading is about the problems online encyclopedias have made them less valuable than the traditional printed ones. However, the lecturer rejects this and says the reading's claim is the result of prejudice against and ignorance about the online encyclopedias.
First, the reading says, people who contributed to online encyclopedias often do not have an academic certificate and, they might write wrong information, but the lecture says the traditional printed sometime is not correct and, you can find mistakes, but in online encyclopedias, if you confront to a mistake, you are able to remove or change it.
Second, the reading says, hackers have an opportunity to delete or add wrong information in the online encyclopedias, but it is not possible to change the information in traditional printed. However, the lecture refutes and, says there are two strategies to prevent this problem, the first strategy is that the crucial information always is stored in a specific section that you can only read it and you are not able to change, the second strategy is that there is a person who always checks articles and if he finds a mistake, he corrects that as soon as possible.
Third, according to the reading, users of online encyclopedias might write unimportant information and, the importance of subjects is not clear to the reader. However, the lecture rejects and, believes that, in online encyclopedias, you can find a lot of diverse topics that you can choose one of them you like also, it has written by many persons but, in traditional printed, there is not enough space and, topics diversity is limited in addition, one person writes that.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88197157756 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498168498168 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.6012377287 49.2860985944 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.0 110.228320801 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 21.698381199 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235768873928 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146281173329 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101028426766 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17531250474 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822546557621 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.3589403974 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 53.8541721854 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.