The passage claims that the best colonization option is sending people to an asteroid by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that it is not a very practical idea and refutes each of the author's reasons.
The passage claims that the best colonization option is sending people to an asteroid by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that it is not a very practical idea and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the writer goes on to mention that low gravity would help easier taking off and landing on the surface of the asteroid, which leads to less use of fuel and much more space for equipment. On the contrary, the professor rejects this by explaining that low gravity has some certain risks and brings health problem for long term colonization. Losing muscle power and decline in bone density are some examples of these problems.
Furthermore, the reading explains that some asteroids are a source of valuable raw materials and metals like gold and platinum. Conversely, the listening supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; he describes that the cost of transporting metal between earth and the asteroid is very high. Moreover, there is no guarantee which the price will remain as same as now. Because an increase in the supply of a product will reduce its price.
Finally, the author argues that some of the asteroids are very close to the earth, even closer than Mars and Moon. Therefore, it will be easy to reach them. The speaker, in contrast, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that it may not easy to return from the landed asteroid to Earth. The asteroids will move away a great distance from the Earth. They circle on a specific orbit which gets close to the earth, however, they will not stay close and will move away even farther than Mars and Moon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 397, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h the price will remain as same as now. Because an increase in the supply of a product ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 33, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e. Finally, the author argues that some of the asteroids are very close to the earth, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78620689655 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3939082419 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.78944714 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319505342504 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111745786133 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189178188233 0.0662205650399 286% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288123844014 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.390545511759 0.0443174109184 881% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.