The passage claims that sending a human to Mars rather than Moon has faced some challenging problems by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that all the problems mentioned in the passage have a solution and refutes each of the author's reasons.
The passage claims that sending a human to Mars rather than Moon has faced some challenging problems by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that all the problems mentioned in the passage have a solution and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the writer goes on to mention that going to the mars and back take almost two years which needs ample supplies of food and water; although, the capacity of the spaceship is limited. On the contrary, the listening rejects this by explaining that astronauts can use some special manner which helps them to cultivate plants in water. Therefore, they should not carry so much food with themselves and the plants can also absorb carbon dioxide and bring oxygen and they have fresh air.
Furthermore, the reading argues that spending many months is zero-gravity situation decrease muscle mass and lower bone density. Conversely, the lecture supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; she describes that there are some spaceships that orbiting around the earth for many months in zero-gravity. There are several techniques to face this challenge; such as using vitamins like calcium which slows the rate of decrease in bones density down.
Finally, the author explains that outside of the Earth's atmosphere there are dangerous levels of space radiation that astronauts should interact with. The speaker, in contrast, refutes this view and illustrates the idea that the spaceship will not be exposed to the radiations all the time. Dangerous radiations occur occasionally and could be faced by some equipment that works until the dangerous situations passed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18315018315 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55119198661 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622710622711 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8299762609 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.636363636 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355735285624 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132884546059 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224885635989 0.0662205650399 340% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267919322049 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.376918361689 0.0443174109184 850% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.