Portrait of Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet
The author of the reading and the lecturer both are about painting Portrait of Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. The reading suggests that the painting was not original work of Rembrandt whereas the lecturer argues the idea presented in the reading passage and states that the painting was original work of Rembrandt. The lecturer has provided crucial reasons with example to claim the work was of Rembrandt.
First of all, the reading points out that there is something inconsistent in the way the woman in the painting is dressed. However, the lecturer refutes this idea and mentions that research and deep analysis of the painting has proved that the fur collar was not the part of the original painting. She adds, fur collar was added after the thousands of year so as to increase the value of the painting. Hence, she believes that the original painting does not have inconsistent dress.
Second, the author of the reading suggests that Rembrandt was the master of the light and the shadow how he would do mistakes in Portrait of Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet by misplacing the color. Nevertheless, the lecturer disputes this point in the reading and suggests that once the recently added fur collar was removed the painting has perfect matching of light and the shadow. She thinks the added part has degraded the quality of the painting and the original painting has all the qualities that Rembrandt other painting possesses.
Finally, the reading claims that the wood panel used in the painting is not similar with the panel that Rembrandt use in his other painting. On other hand, the lecturer states that the wood panel was enlarged along with the painting when it was modified. In addition, she states the original painting has the wood panel from the same plant which Rembrandt used in other painting.
In this way, although the author and the reading both are about the same painting Portrait of Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet, the lecturer has effectively challenged the main idea of the reading passage by providing the cogent reasons and perfect example.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ainting was original work of Rembrandt. The lecturer has provided crucial reasons w...
^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...r was added after the thousands of year so as to increase the value of the painting. Hen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, as to, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92613636364 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41238518333 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.380681818182 0.540411800872 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6935439714 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.857142857 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177972165894 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930521071569 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172508107398 0.0662205650399 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140525260906 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114655586525 0.0443174109184 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.