Prevalence of dinosaurs because of mass extinction
The author introduces some evidence indicating that the mass extinction about 200 million years ago caused the prevalence of dinosaurs in Triasssic period. The professor, in contrast, throws doubt on all the critics and refutes all the author's reasons.
Firstly, the reading passage underlines the fact that shrink the level of seas and accordingly, demolition of coastal and shallow specious which may result in disturbances of food chain can be one reason. The lecturer, conversely, repudiates that the decrease of sea level and extinction of coastal specious have been occurred gradually not abruptly. Therefore, the oceans cannot leave the negative consequences on the marine animals and ultimately their extinction. Hence, what is mentioned in the text cannot be tenable.
Secondly, the writer asserts that the subsistence of volcanic eruptions engendering so2 which leads to global warming can be another must. The speaker, on the contrary, dismisses this point due to the thought that the emission of so2 from volcanic activities is a slow and gradual phenomenon in which the so2 can combine with the water vapor in the atmosphere and then return to the earth consecutively. Thus, this cannot be large enough detrimental event to extent that the text is pointed out. Based on this fact, regarding the climate cooling derived from the emancipation of So2 cannot be plausible.
Thirdly, the scrivener brings up on the issue that the displaced debris originating from the asteroid strike is another reason for mass extinction, since they inhibit from entering the light to the earth and paly as impediments from sunlight to reach the earth. The orator, nevertheless, posits that because the craters unearthed date back to 2 million years previous than the mass extinction, so it does not seem reasonable to consider the asteroids colliding (# (noun) collision) with the earth as a culprit of the predominance of dinosaurs on earth. As a result, the opinion of the author cannot be defensible.
(330 words)
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, conversely, first, firstly, hence, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28348909657 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83809475478 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.2719044257 49.2860985944 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8461538462 7.06452816374 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145645156692 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395533060208 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829341007546 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902656867716 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841957113368 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.