The article discusses about the disadvantages of the commercial fossils. However, the lecturer in the listening section diagrees; she mentions that the given explanations in the reading passage are highly exaggerated and the advantages of commercial fossils far outweights it's disadvantages.
To begin with, the reading posits that public suffers as they will not be able to view the fossils, and eventually, it will reduce the interest of the public in fosssils. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this statement and says that it actually increases the possibility to see by the general public as the fossils can be purchased by the public schools and put it for exhibition.
Futhermore, the article claims that scientists are likely to miss out some of the information related to past life forms. The professor disagrees with the idea and says that the explanation is unrealistic. She goes on saying that, while putting the commercial value of the fossils, scientists are the ones that identify the fossils and put the value; therefore, scientific experts will not miss single information on this field.
Finally, the reading explains that commercial fossil unearthers destroy the scientific evidence associated with the fossil. Nonetheless, the professor refutes this argument by mentioning that there are less scientific institutions that are working for the discovery of the fossils, and the involvement of the commercial fossil collectors helps to identify and discover the more fossils; consequently, leading to more discoveries of the fossils. By this, the professor believes that the involvement of the commercial fossil collectors is far more advantageous than its disadvantages.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...increases the possibility to see by the general public as the fossils can be purchased by the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... that scientists are likely to miss out some of the information related to past life forms....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, finally, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56370656371 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10602342616 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501930501931 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1772817443 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.1 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809600445033 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035718442941 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356789657541 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475784305487 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324611606752 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...increases the possibility to see by the general public as the fossils can be purchased by the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... that scientists are likely to miss out some of the information related to past life forms....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, finally, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56370656371 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10602342616 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501930501931 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1772817443 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.1 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809600445033 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035718442941 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356789657541 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475784305487 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324611606752 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.