privatization of spaceflights
The article states that the privatization of spaceflights will bring advantages to both government and public. However, the speaker thinks otherwise and refutes each of the reasons used in the article.
To begin with, the passage insists that the privatization of the space industry will decrease the cost of space flights since there will be competition among private companies. As a result tourists and scholars will benefit from reducing prices. Nonetheless, the lecturer contends this point by explaining that any spaceship requires expensive systems to prevent from collisions. Besides that, spacecrafts call for very high-cost testing that will not allow prices to go down.
What is more, the reading reports that private aerospace companies will sponsor scientific researches, that will lead to an increase in some crucial discoveries. Still, the listening asserts that private companies can stop developing of researches. According to the speaker, specialists can move from federally paid jobs to private companies and start to work on commercial stuff instead of fundamental issues.
In addition, the article claims that costs and taxes of space exploration will lay on customers of the industry that will lighten the burden . Nevertheless, the lecture opposes this point by explaining that the cost will be so huge that a few tourists will be able to pay for it. As a result, private investments will not provide enough money to the space projects. Taxes are an essential part of space exploration that will not go even if private companies come to this area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he industry that will lighten the burden . Nevertheless, the lecture opposes this ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, in addition, as a result, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3453815261 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84045348492 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0095915772 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.384615385 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214190112798 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841680050502 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964169498334 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144253937072 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614728043696 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.