Reading and lecture are debating whether or not appearances on televisions of professors offer advantages for multiple parts. The writer states that this is beneficial for professors, for universities and for public, providing three reasons of support. The lecturer however casts doubts on the claims made by the writer, affirming that these arguments are inaccurate when compared with reality.
First, professors are negatively affected when appearing on television because they gain a reputation of being entertainer, and not serious academicians. Furthermore, they might not be invited to conferences anymore. In addition to this, their chances to receive funds for researches decrease considerably, because they are not perceived as being professionals. This is a strong counter point against the passage.
Second, these activities take a lot of time since the professors have to prepare themselves for appearing in front of camera. They have to do their presentations, rehearsals, sometimes they have to travel. Because of this, their time for participating in students discussion, university businesses, conferences is limited, and as a consequence the universities practices are negatively influenced. This gainsays the writer's point of view.
Third, public does not gain anything from these shows, because the professors do not offer in-depth details in their lectures. The passages asserts that it is a unique experience for numerous people to learn how academic system works. Anyway, the lecturer refutes this, arguing that the professors provide only a general view over a topic. Moreover, a good reporter, who previously has made some researches about a topic, can easily present the same content as the professors'. Thus, since the professors does not delivers a high level intellectual content, public does not benefit from them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Reading and lecture are debating whether or not appearances on televisions of professor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasons of support. The lecturer however casts doubts on the claims made by the w...
^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'assert'.
Suggestion: assert
...details in their lectures. The passages asserts that it is a unique experience for nume...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'deliver'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: deliver
...rs. Thus, since the professors does not delivers a high level intellectual content, publ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'deliver'
Suggestion: deliver
...rs. Thus, since the professors does not delivers a high level intellectual content, publ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, third, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6523297491 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05225281094 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4634059042 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5625 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154455886628 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508055591367 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399189162464 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959614482468 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181710443813 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.