Professors should appear on TV which ultimately benefits their respective universities and the professors themselves. Also this benefits the general public. Read the passage and hear the audio and answer the question.
The article and the lecture both talk about television appearances of professors and whether these benefit the university and the professor himself or not? The article believes the television appearances of professors benefit everybody including the professors themselves, their universities and the public too.
The lecture casts doubt on these claims and mentions that televisions appearances might not be beneficial as they have described in the article.
Firstly, The article points out that professors benefit from these appearances help professors get a wider audiences and they gain a standing in their academic field. Also it is mentioned that if a professor is appearing on TV, thousands of people outside their regular academic audiences will view and appreciate their views. These points are challenged in the lecture. The lecture argues that TV appearances do not benefit the professor instead harm their careers. They gain reputation only among their fellow professors and hence they are not invited to important conferences, work and research.
Secondly, The author of the article contends that Universities benefit from the professors television appearances as they receive positive publicity. seeing a knowledgeable faculty on tv, people trust the university and think more highly of the university. The article further notes that this improved image of the university leads to donations for the university and more applications from potential students. The lecture rebuts this argument. The lecture suggests that university do not benefit from TV shows by professors because student meetings or other academic work is not done due to lack of time as all of the professors time is gone in the TV shows, its presentations, Preparation, Travel and also looking on the television. The lecture elaborates that the responsibilities of the professors towards the students will not be completed and the students will lack essential guidance from professors because they are not available on time.
Finally, the article states that there are lot of public gains because of the professors tv appearances. The viewers will get an taste of real expertise. But the lecture posits this view by pointing out that people are not interested in academic serious knowledgeable people on tv but rather they are interested in introduction to a movie and other sort of things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...their universities and the public too. The lecture casts doubt on these claims and...
^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ain a standing in their academic field. Also it is mentioned that if a professor is ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lso it is mentioned that if a professor is appearing on TV, thousands of people outside thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ends that Universities benefit from the professors television appearances as they receive ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Seeing
...ces as they receive positive publicity. seeing a knowledgeable faculty on tv, people t...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 446, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ents. The lecture rebuts this argument. The lecture suggests that university do not...
^^^
Line 6, column 609, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...work is not done due to lack of time as all of the professors time is gone in the TV shows...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 736, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...vel and also looking on the television. The lecture elaborates that the responsibil...
^^^
Line 8, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... are lot of public gains because of the professors tv appearances. The viewers will get an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rs tv appearances. The viewers will get an taste of real expertise. But the lectur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1373.03311258 147% => OK
No of words: 370.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43783783784 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98862709147 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456756756757 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 419.366225166 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1177841126 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.352941176 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33445837143 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126760401731 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953520455186 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19366613357 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114496865746 0.0443174109184 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.