professors in the television

Essay topics:

professors in the television

The passage states that participating in tv programs by university professors is beneficial in some ways and provides three reason of support. However, the lecturer says that it is not useful and refutes each of the reasons.

First, the article explains that professors obtain a great validity and respect in their scientific ground but the lecturer does not confirm this reason by saying that having a program in television have an destructive outcome in professional standpoint because people think that this person is good entertainer not a serious scholar.

Second, the passage claims that universities earn reputation when their professors are shown in the television. The lecturer challenges this explanation and says that attending in a tv program is very time consuming for professors. they need time to travel to prepare the material and for rehearsing thus, wasting time for a university professor is not acceptable for people and it has a negative result.

Third, the reading avers that public learn scientific matters deeply by means more scientific programs with presence of professors. The lecturer claims that this reason is not precise because the material of tv networks could not be about deep academic lectures and they must be about some superficial and brief subjects such as a concise history of a happening.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hat having a program in television have an destructive outcome in professional sta...
^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... is very time consuming for professors. they need time to travel to prepare the mate...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29107981221 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8468439908 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.328238549 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.875 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155826964272 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603527653572 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063941041545 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895527159453 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584229080846 0.0443174109184 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.