Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage medical about patient traditionally or electronic

Essay topics:

Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.

medical about patient traditionally or electronic

Actually, both the passage and the lecture comment about the electronic medical records method, which is replaced by traditional storing methods. Although the writing brings three hypothesizes for proving the claim that electronic records are more beneficial, the lecturer puts those theories under question. According to the lecturer, none of those reasons are convincing; thus, he doesn't reinforce them.

First of all, as illustrated by the passage installing electronic databases, total expense will considerably be declined by eliminating the extra money that has been spent on providing storage space. the speaker; however, refutes the idea by emphasizing the fact that doctors haven't stopped the use of the paper-based manners. He puts forward that it counted as an emergency backup that is such a legal document.

Second, as indicated in the writing the electronic way of collecting data decreases the number of faults because of the obvious texts which have been typed in a readable font; nonetheless, the speaker rebuts the thought by stating the idea that a vast majority of doctors utilize pen and paper; hence, the staffs, who transfer the notes, make errors. he elaborates on this claim that the poor handwriting causes such wrongs to be repeated.

Finally, the article declares that scholars can investigate by access to a wide range of saved data without encountering previous obstacles. On the contrary, the professor repudiates it by expressing that strict and sophisticated legislative restriction causes the data to be accessed by explorer easily.

Votes
Average: 2.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... those reasons are convincing; thus, he doesnt reinforce them. First of all, as i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... been spent on providing storage space. the speaker; however, refutes the idea by e...
^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ea by emphasizing the fact that doctors havent stopped the use of the paper-based mann...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...s, who transfer the notes, make errors. he elaborates on this claim that the poor ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, hence, however, nonetheless, second, so, thus, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49590163934 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87371952486 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5584121634 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.1 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0713104908778 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252323941696 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264900670498 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0379465265301 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215030337308 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.42419426049 124% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.