The lecture and the reading are both about an animal Repenomamus robustus whether was a hunter or not. The author of the reading believes that R robustus was scavenger. The lecturer casts doubt on claims made by the author.She notes that the mammal was an active hunter.
First of all, the author argues that R robustus was small in the size of domestic cat. The article mentions that with such a little height, this creature could not hunt. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She states that robustus was twice as massive as young child of psittacosaurs. Additonally, professor thinks its weight was much more than prey's, which can ease hunting process for R robustus.
Secondly, the writer suggests that an evidence about legs support the fact that these animals were egg-eater. In the article, it is said that their short legs restricted the pursuit of preys. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning Tasmanian Devil. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that since this modern critter can move fast with short legs, the Repenomamus robustus could chase their foods with high speed, meaning that it was an active predator.
Finally, the author posits that there are not marks of teeth on eaten dinosaur's bones. Moreover, it is pointed out R robustus found not protected nest with eggs (inside the eggshell were small baby psittacosaur) and then swallowed them. In contrast, the lecturer claims that there were firm jaws of the ancient mammal for grabbing and holding on prey. She thinks that the predator did not used back teeth to bite and swallowed its prey as a whole or in large parts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The lecture and the reading are both abo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...believes that R robustus was scavenger. The lecturer casts doubt on claims made by ...
^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...asts doubt on claims made by the author.She notes that the mammal was an active hun...
^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llenged by the lecturer. She states that robustus was twice as massive as young c...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n critter can move fast with short legs, the Repenomamus robustus could chase the...
^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urs bones. Moreover, it is pointed out R robustus found not protected nest with e...
^^
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing and holding on prey. She thinks that the predator did not used back teeth to ...
^^
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
.... She thinks that the predator did not used back teeth to bite and swallowed its pr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... its prey as a whole or in large parts.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90252707581 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42528892145 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5597440753 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.875 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255899580002 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909871445109 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109242755311 0.0662205650399 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163013885771 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789039096221 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.