The Turing test, conceived by Alan Turing in 1950, allows participants to interact with person or a computer in separated room by speaking into a microphone or typing questions onto a computer. When they receive an answer by voice synthesizer or by texts on computer screens, subjects must determine whether they have been keeping in touch with a computer or with a human being. If they think that they have been interacting with a person or they are unable to decide, then the computer has passed the test, proving that the machine is actually capable of higher level thought processes similar to those of a human brain.
According to the lecture, however, a machine can be programmed to produce responses that appear to be intelligent without the awareness required for thought. In John Searle's Chinese room, an english-speaking person is able to respond to questions in Chinese by referring to source material that allows him or her to break the code without comprehending the underlying meaning of the symbols. The person can behave correctly without the higher-level thought required to process the meaning.
Therefore, a computer could pass the Turing test if it were programmed to generate behavioral output but the Test itself would be flawed. The experiment would not prove that a computer can think.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The Turing test, conceived by Alan Turin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ses similar to those of a human brain. According to the lecture, however, a mac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the lecture, however, a machine can be programmed to produce responses that app...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ought required to process the meaning. Therefore, a computer could pass the Tur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81968389788 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9727802841 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121626784749 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701655327352 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744613983171 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901544707739 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436671246782 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.