The reading claims that the using Fuel-cell engines have several advantags than the using internal -comustion engine as a main source of automobile's power. However, the lecture finds all the idea dubious and provides some evidence to refute them all
At first, the reading asserts that the hydrogen needed for fuel-cell engined cannot easily be reduced and depleted because it can be derived frome various several sources. Conversely, the proffesor explains that hydrogen is not easily available and Fuel-cell engines requires liquid hydrogen that it needs a very hard technology to convert hydrogen gases to liquid.
Furtheremore, the passage claims that hydrogen-based fuel cells will solve many of the world's pollution problems because they don't produce any carbon dioxide that is a harmful gas for environment. On the contrary the lecture brings the fact that factorie that produce this kind of engines consume a lot of energy like oil and fuels that produce pollution.
Finally, according to the readind, fuel-cell engines will be soon economically competitive because people spned less money to operate a fuel-cell engine than they will to operate an internal-combustion engine.. In contrast, the lecture explains that fuel-cell engines need a material(platinum) which is so expensive and this material couldn't have replaced with less expensive materials.
The reading claims that the using Fuel-cell engines have several advantags than the using internal -comustion engine as the main source of automobile's power. However, the lecture finds all the idea dubious and provides some evidence to refute them all
At first, the reading asserts that the hydrogen needed for fuel-cell engined cannot easily be reduced and depleted because it can be derived frome various several sources. Conversely, the proffesor explains that hydrogen is not easily available and Fuel-cell engines requires liquid hydrogen that it needs a very hard technology to convert hydrogen gases to liquid.
Furtheremore, the passage claims that hydrogen-based fuel cells will solve many of the world's pollution problems because they don't produce any carbon dioxide that is a harmful gas for environment. On the contrary the lecture brings the fact that factorie that produce this kind of engines consume a lot of energy like oil and fuels that produce pollution.
Finally, according to the readind, fuel-cell engines will be soon economically competitive because people spned less money to operate a fuel-cell engine than they will to operate an internal-combustion engine.. In contrast, the lecture explains that fuel-cell engines need a material(platinum) which is so expensive and this material couldn't have replaced with less expensive materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat hydrogen is not easily available and Fuel-cell engines requires liquid hydrog...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...based fuel cells will solve many of the worlds pollution problems because they dont pr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... worlds pollution problems because they dont produce any carbon dioxide that is a ha...
^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...to operate an internal-combustion engine.. In contrast, the lecture explains that ...
^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...which is so expensive and this material couldnt have replaced with less expensive mater...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, so, as for, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53110047847 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88225789003 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.9442705006 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.142857143 110.228320801 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 7.06452816374 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467052213822 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214026059336 0.0996497079465 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.204037416038 0.0662205650399 308% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340989434987 0.162205337803 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.366972785559 0.0443174109184 828% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.3589403974 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 53.8541721854 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.0289183223 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.