The reading passage and the lecture are disccusing regulations that United State should regulate establish to regulate handling of coal ash material and prevent their harmful damage by their chemical material. The author claim several reasons to explain that these regulations have no benefits. However, the lecture casts doubt on claim made in article. She proposes, governoment should put a strict regulation to this harmful product.
To begin with, the authoe states, this regulation rules already found. He elaborates on using liner-special material to prevent leakage of coal ash into soil. The lecturer opposes this argument. She states, only new lines use these protective material. Moreover, old lines damaged and need repair because chemical products seepge to water and cause water polution.
In addition, the writer asserts, this stricte rules on handiling and storing coal she will incourage consumers to recycle this material. They will be concern it about degerousness and stop buying it. The professor refutes this notion. She mentions mercury as example of material that governoment put very strict rule for using it for many years. Mercury sill is still used by people in a lot of purpose.
The author condents, putting stricte rules will increase coal price and , will increase electric cost. The professor denies this reason. She states using rules will cost governoment about 15% cost. In other hand, it will incease electric bill about 1% only. This is not a big deal compare with their benefits.
The reading passage and the lecture are disccusing regulations that United State should regulate establish to regulate handling of coal ash material and prevent their harmful damage by their chemical material. The author claim several reasons to expain that these regulations have no benefits. However, the lecture casts doubt on claim made in article. She proposes, governoment should put a stricte regulation to this harmful product.
To begin with, the authoe states, this regulation rules already found. He elaborates on using liner-special material to prevent leakage of coal ash into soil. The lecturer opposes this argument. She states, only new lines use these protective material. Moreover, old lines damaged and need repair becuase chemical products seepge to water and cause water polution.
In addition, the writer asserts, this stricte rules on handiling and storing coal she will incourage consumers to recycle this material. They will be concern it about degerousness and stop buying it. The professor refutes this notion. She mentions mercury as example of material that govrnoment put very strict rule for using it for many years. Mercury sill is still used by people in a lot of purpose.
The author condents, putting stricte rules will increase coal price and , will increase electric cost. The professor denies this reason. She staesusing rules will cost governoment about 15% cost. In other hand, it will incease electric bill about 1% only. This is not a big deal compare with their benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
- Many decisions in our life should be taken carefully and is a specifict time this is due to their importance to draw our future correctly A ny delay in takeing any decision may has a negative effect on our life The question is whether in the past our kids 66
- The reading passage and the lecture discuss several possibilities about of Little Ice Age the writer claims several reasons beyond occurring of Little Ice Age However the lecturer contradicts each point which is mentioned in article She says unfortunately 75
- The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of using electric medical record over traditional paper based record keeping The author claims that using medical records in electronic databases more beneficial than traditional paper based record kee 80
- The passage and lecture are both about Chevalier de Seingalt life and the accuracy of his memoir Writer of passage arised doubts about the accurecy of the memoir lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article he says these memoirs are predictible and there 76
- The passage and lecture are bouth talking about Guackers which emits in Russian word frog sound The passage claim several reason which cause the odd of this sound The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She suggests there is a problem with each 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
... by their chemical material. The author claim several reasons to expain that these re...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey will be concern it about degerousness and stop buying it. The professor refute...
^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ricte rules will increase coal price and , will increase electric cost. The profes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, still, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32083333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5195709567 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1265192025 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.2105263158 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6315789474 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.94736842105 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351845633589 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941980220294 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179916222419 0.0662205650399 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233270283286 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.277472775503 0.0443174109184 626% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.