The reading passage states that lack of salt level increase in the Salton sea in California and if the trend continues, the lack will be unable to support fish and birds population. In this regard, the article prepares several solutions. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage states that lack of salt level increase in the Salton sea in California and if trend continues, the lack will be unable to support fish and birds population. In this regard, the article prepares several solutions. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, the article considering is direct removal of salt from the lake's water in desalination facilities. In contrast, the professor contradicts the idea and further explains that pumping salt from lack leaves some toxic chemical materials in the land and also release them to the air. These kinds of deposits make problems for humans and other species.
Second, the reading passage claims that dilute the salt level in the lake with water from the ocean is a great solution. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture makes the points about information presented in the article and says that this idea requires expensive channels structure and state governments can not afford it. The project is very cost-consume.
Third, the writer in the reading puts forward the idea that governments would be control the lake's salinity by constructing walls to divide the lake into several parts and avoid losing water. In the same way, the speaker validates the idea and talks about the lake location with intense geological activity, which is not suitable for constructing walls because the walls collapse with earth's activity such as earthquakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...a that governments would be control the lakes salinity by constructing walls to divid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.194092827 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59639422551 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1657203608 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.909090909 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342372569565 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122430323217 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180268559899 0.0662205650399 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230548411788 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250499827789 0.0443174109184 565% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.