The reading passage suggests that the mentioned explorer indeed reached the Noth Pole in 1909. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that Peary's assertions are false.
This material addresses the question of Robert E. Peary's possible expedition to the North Pole. The reading passage suggests that the mentioned explorer indeed reached the Noth Pole in 1909. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that Peary's assertions are false.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that Peary's records and tools were examined by the National Geographic Society, which confirmed the truthfulness of the explorer's claims. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that the relevant experts were Peary's friends, who financed his expedition; moreover the examination itself took only two days, a fact that undermines the objectiveness of such an expertise as well.
Additionally, the article posits that another more recent expedition to the North Pole was conducted in merely the same amount of time than that of Pole's. However, the lecturer advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, she mentions that during the recent expedition the weather was more favourable and that this time dogs were not overloaded by food, since it was delivered by other transportation. So, the conditions of the two expeditions were not the same.
Finally, the article invites attention to the fact that shadows from Peary's photos made presumably in the North Pole seem to correspond exactly to the Sun's anticipated position in that region. This goes counter to the information from the listening passage, according to which, the the quality of the camery used and the photos as well could not be sufficient to support the approach. Thus, the camera had no focus, and the photo was blurred.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... listening passage, according to which, the the quality of the camery used and the phot...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... listening passage, according to which, the the quality of the camery used and the phot...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2734082397 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73703088667 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4165624172 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.307692308 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345544940902 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127234423286 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188618114555 0.0662205650399 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24223221091 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.293506076392 0.0443174109184 662% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.