In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations.
First, frogs are being harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane. Pesticides often spread from farmland into neighboring frog habitats. Once pesticides enter a frog’s body, they attack the nervous system, leading to severe breathing problems. If laws prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog populations, it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs.
A second major factor in frog population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world with deadly effect. The fungus causes thickening of the skin, and since frogs use their skin to absorb water, infected frogs die of dehydration. Recently, researchers have discovered several ways to treat or prevent infection, including antifungal medication and treatments that kill the fungus with heat. Those treatments, if applied on a large scale, would protect sensitive frog populations from infection.
Third, in a great many cases, frog populations are in decline simply because their natural habitats are threatened. Since most frog species lay their eggs in water, they are dependent on water and wetland habitats. Many such habitats are threatened by human activities, including excessive water use or the draining of wetlands to make them suitable for development. If key water habitats such as lakes and marshes were better protected from excessive water use and development, many frog sp
The reading and lecture were both about the prevention of frogs from the extinction. While reading passage suggested three methods to solve problem of declining frog population, the lecturer feels that those methods are not practical.
First of all, the author points out that the reducing the use of pesticides can solve the problem of frog extinction.The lecturer challenges this points. She states that this solution will not be economical and fair to the farmers in those restricted areas. She also suggest that this restriction will cause great loss to those farmers because of low yield compared to farmers in other areas.
Secondly, the author states that anti fungal treatment that kill the fungus with heat is a good solution of frog decline due to fungus spread. The lecturer, on the other hand, suggests that it is not possible to treat individual frogs as it involve a lot of effort. She also posits that this treatment will not prevent the fungal spread from frog to its offspring. This requires to treat offspring separately, which will be very expensive and complicated.
Thirdly, the author puts forth another solution of restricting human activity in natural habitats of frogs. The lecturer rebuts this by stating that the main cause of decline in natural habitat is not human involvement but the global warming .Thus, by prohibiting human activities in water habitats will not solve the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...an solve the problem of frog extinction.The lecturer challenges this points. She st...
^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...ers in those restricted areas. She also suggest that this restriction will cause great ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'treating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: treating
...om frog to its offspring. This requires to treat offspring separately, which will be ver...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olution of restricting human activity in natural habitats of frogs. The lecturer ...
^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...human involvement but the global warming .Thus, by prohibiting human activities in...
^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...man involvement but the global warming .Thus, by prohibiting human activities in wat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13362068966 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5826376232 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547413793103 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5522381764 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.272727273 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0911969740212 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388593403136 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312192378258 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591239592454 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382022746199 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.