Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Universities do many things in order to improve the academic excellence of the college. In fact, it is important that both the students and academicians get the maximum benefit out of these various methods. Many universities focus on libraries, laboratory and scientific methods to increase professional success. In my opinion however, increasing the salary of the professors is the most important requirement to achieve the same due to a variety of reasons.
First of all, spending money on salaries is important because it will attract highly qualified and well experienced faculty, which is worth it for high standard education. Those professors have superior knowledge and understanding of the academic requirements than any junior teachers. For example, a university who provide good package of salary gets the highly competent teachers with many years of academic experience.The senior faculty who has ten years of experience can make realistic academic curriculum and structure for the institution. Moreover, experienced teacher can simulate competent exam models which help students to perform well in national level examinations. Also, a senior faculty can guide other junior teachers. thus the team work of all the faculty members helps the university to attain the professional standards and quality. Hence, paying higher salary is indispensable for professionally qualified teachers.
Secondly, providing teachers with high salary will enable them to fully dedicate their time and energy in the college work, which in turn reflect in students academic performance. As the lecturer is sufficiently paid, he do not have to worry about making extra money for his life expenditure, thus puts a hundred percent effort to academic work. In the aforementioned example, the senior faculty in my college was very well paid. She was so dedicated to her work by helping both the students and faculty. Her high salary package can be the reason behind her dedicated and excellent academic services. On the contrary, if she was not paid well, she may have to do some part time job to make her extra living. This may puts a physical toll on her health making her weak and stressed. Higher the salary, more productive the faculty member will be hence, delivers great academic lectures.
In conclusion, colleges should definitely consider paying sufficient salary to academicians to ensure quality education. Those lecturers will be highly qualified and passionate about their job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... with many years of academic experience.The senior faculty who has ten years of exp...
^^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...aculty can guide other junior teachers. thus the team work of all the faculty member...
^^^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...aculty can guide other junior teachers. thus the team work of all the faculty member...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...s the lecturer is sufficiently paid, he do not have to worry about making extra mo...
^^
Line 5, column 670, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... not paid well, she may have to do some part time job to make her extra living. This may ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42377260982 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93878094468 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547803617571 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8274393242 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9523809524 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126372810273 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380900573478 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441134208166 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843791342129 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211158198267 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.