Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Some people believe that for the betterment of the country the government should spend money on school children whereas some says that more money should be invested on university level. In my opinion, government should spend more on the university education. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, universities provide new technological innovations and research developments, which in turn helps the countries prosperity. Undoubtedly, university has to be well equipped with qualified professors and lab facilities, which need a lot of funds from government than the funds required for running high school. For instance, if I compare academic curriculum of my university with my high school, I can say that at university I did intense research and development project. The research project on drug development was funded by government and the results was fully utilized for the drug development of the major industries in my country.
Secondly, I believe that university molds a student to be a competent and great professional. The countries development and prosperity lies with the budding generation and how competent they are in the global market. While at schools children learn the basics of education, at university they learn how to apply it to the life and to become successful. For example at my university they taught me the marketing strategies of drug industry. In short it is very important for government to fund more university to build a great background for countries progress.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that government should allocate more money for university than high school. This is because university education is much complex which needs lot of funds for functioning and also university education presents country with competent professionals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...h developments, which in turn helps the countries prosperity. Undoubtedly, university has...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...a competent and great professional. The countries development and prosperity lies with th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is very important for government to fund more university to build a great backgro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in short, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 289.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39446366782 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10229177697 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508650519031 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1203915576 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.357142857 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 5.45110844103 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238538326853 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957997627501 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695241267057 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168017497422 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05012053601 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.