Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days, young generation has to follow many rules and regulations. In fact, it is important that these rules and regulations should be directed towards the well being of every citizen. Many young people probably think that society expect them to obey strict rules which is not fair. In my opinion however, rules are very much required and cannot be considered strict due to a variety of reasons .
Firstly, I believe that it is the attitude of youngsters that make a rule strict or easy. While a gentlemen feels that rules are necessary and indispensable for a better society, a foolish person perceives the same rule with a negative sense. For example, a student who is very found of drinking, will feel annoyed of the rule that liquor should not be served below eighteen years of age. This same rule is accepted and followed by other young people because they are not addicted to alcohol. Therefore, it is not about the strictness of the law but the person's dependence on alcohol made him to feel that the law is not appropriate or too harsh to follow. Additionally, this rule protect our community from the dangers of drug addicts and alcoholics and also save young people from the tendency to follow this bad habits. Hence, rules are essential and person's perception makes rule easy or harsh.
Secondly, as society respect the freedom and happiness of young people they cannot impose or expect young people to follow strict rules. Rather, the rules which community execute on young generation is solely for their betterment and safety. For instance, the rule about 'juvenile licence' is made with the sole purpose of safety of young drivers and other people on the road. The rule strictly insist student drivers to practice driving only with the guidance of an elderly person . As a result, the person who sits with the young man can restrict him from harsh driving and speeding, which is the main reason of accidents these days. As youngsters are not well aware about the consequences of his action, a proper rule can constantly remind him about it. Gradually the student will learn from all these rules and become a mature driver. Hence, rules are necessary for young people even though it is hard to follow initially.
In conclusion,I strongly believe that society always expect youngsters to obey rules and regulation which is very appropriate. This is because rule follower's mindset makes a rule stringent or easy and also all rules are made for the betterment of the whole community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dered strict due to a variety of reasons . Firstly, I believe that it is the at...
^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d below eighteen years of age. This same rule is accepted and followed by other y...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...about the strictness of the law but the persons dependence on alcohol made him to feel ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y with the guidance of an elderly person . As a result, the person who sits with t...
^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...rd to follow initially. In conclusion,I strongly believe that society always ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88941176471 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49301136392 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475294117647 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1203277802 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.9523809524 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2380952381 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294238715425 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105827579476 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648966899142 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204410042812 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255948362572 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.