It is common for medical researchers to conduct experiments on animals, a process called vivisection. The lecturer is strongly opposed to this idea, and contends why vivisection is an immoral practice. The reading passage however, believes that human well being is paramount and vivisection is a completely acceptable practice.
First, the reading passage says that there are no good substitutes for medical experiments on animals. The lecturer strongly refutes this, with today’s technology it is possible to artificially cultivate human tissues in lab and experiment on these, further computer simulations can also be used as an alternative. In fact, there have been cases where drugs that worked on humans did not work as expected in animals and vice-versa. Although, it is accepted that drugs such as Pencilin, Insulin etc. where discovered because of animal experiments, that does not mean they would not have been discovered otherwise.
Another argument that the reading passage makes is that, the animals are treated well, in healthy and comfortable environments, with anesthesia provided when required. However, the lecturer draws from her personal experience and contends that this is not always true. The lecturer has herself witnessed researchers performing experiments with toxins on animals with diseases.
The lecturer strongly believes that no experiment should be performed on any living being without their consent, and since that’s not possible for animals, researchers have no right to perform experiments on them. It’s absolutely immoral no matter what for researchers to conduct medical experiments on living animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dical experiments on living animals.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72983870968 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97561794577 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568548387097 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2232100564 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.307692308 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122199819977 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481436150384 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412480719892 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782640541796 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00701560259913 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.