The article here states about the famous dutch painter Rembrandt of the seventeenth century and provides that one of painting known as Potrait of an Elderly Women in a White Bonnel casted doubt that was it actually made by him. However, the professor in the lecture explains that each and every point made in article was false and the painting was made by Rembrandt.
First, the article states about the dressing of women. The cap was a kind of what servant wore and other the collar of the coat won't be affordable to servant. So there was a mismatch in dressing. However, the professor here talks about the X-Ray analysis and says that the collar of the coat was made much after the painting was made atleast after 100 years from the date it was painted.
Second, the article describes the error in painting light and shadow in which he was a master. The professor refutes to this by saying that in the original painting there was light coloured cloth which is the cause of illumination of light on face. And that part of painting was repainted to make the painting appear large and best.
Third, the article says that the Rembrandt used wood panel and the painting had pieces of wood glued with each other which was not his style. The professor here states that to enlarge the painting the wood pieces were used. And the tree from which the wood pieces were made was similar to the wood used in his painting know as Self Potrait with Hat. And thus we come to know that the paiting was originally made by Rembrandt and later in time was edited to give a grandiose effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: Woman
...painting known as Potrait of an Elderly Women in a White Bonnel casted doubt that was...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, second, so, third, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55087719298 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1741931919 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459649122807 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9572276842 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7692307692 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225073613743 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947994750304 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843180942632 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157800113575 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942330651719 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 12.2367328918 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.