The article states that the United state's school organization borrowed from European System separates students into grades in a chronological manner. Student at six starts the formal schooling and are said to be in first grade. Then according to grades, the students are divided into three groups; Primary Education(1-5/6), Intermediate grades or junior high school(from 6/7 to next 3 years) and last secondary school(9/10). However, the professor explains that this organization of grades has many loop holes and undermine the capability of the individual student.
First, the paragraph states that student at the age of six is considered to be in their first grade. The professor refutes to this point by stating that some children are ready for their first grade on their 4th or 5th birthday and some aren't. He supports his point by saying that the teen age children have differences in them in terms of maturity, physically and socially. Still, they are grouped under the same grades which hamper the development of their individual personality.
Secondly, the article implies that all the student in similar grade are evaluated on a similar basis. However, the professor states that some students are faster in learning grasp the contents quickly and then needs to wait for other students who have a slower rate, who needs to repeat already learned content to keep up with the class. With this point, the professor makes the point that individual differences are never addressed in this school system.
Thirdly the professor states that some students need to repeat the complete year which in turn lead to higher drop out rate. This in all the professor refutes to the point made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a chronological manner" with adverb for "chronological"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n System separates students into grades in a chronological manner. Student at six starts the formal schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...e on their 4th or 5th birthday and some arent. He supports his point by saying that t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
...e supports his point by saying that the teen age children have differences in them in te...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to grasp'
Suggestion: to grasp
...at some students are faster in learning grasp the contents quickly and then needs to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12186379928 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62933459132 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530465949821 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3888432201 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276380669615 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106411930721 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107161707789 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153131991346 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10935952153 0.0443174109184 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.